Raiser sharp
Re OG's letter in this week's motoring I think you express the same misunderstanding many people do. OG still receives the protected no claims discount he pays for, but the premium to which the discount is applied has increased. The increase is due to his "unresolved blame" accidents. The real injustice is that these are deemed "fault" by the insurance company who are unable or unwilling to resolve claims against the third party. The discount is protected, but the premium is not.
Asked on 7 November 2009 by
Answered by
Honest John
Received and understood. Many thanks. And obviously so outrageous it amounts to fraud. A policyholder pays for a protected no claim discount. But his basic premium is nevertheless raised because of a claim whether his fault or not. What one hand sells, the other hand snatches away. How would you feel if you bought a sandwich, then the sandwich vendor took it back? Or you bought a pint in the pub and the landlord drank it himself?
We give you the low down on how to save on insurance, little-known tricks and tips, what insurance groups mean and how to use insurance aggregators to beat insurers.
Insurance group finder and how to save on insuranceSimilar questions
Is it worth paying £17 to protect 14 years of no claims bonus when renewing my insurance?
My partner had an accident with a German registered HGV in October 2015. My insurers, AXA, were given written statements and photographs at the time denying liability and empathised that the collision...
How much is my premium likely to go up following a minor at-fault bump?
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
