AdBlue vs non-AdBlue - which is best?
I am looking at a new Skoda Superb Estate. The two options I have narrowed it down to are the 1.6TDi Greenline (with AdBlue) or the 2.0TDi (150PS, non-AdBlue, just DPF), either in SE spec. Given the history of DPFs, would AdBlue be more reliable? The car would be driven 25k-30k per annum.
Asked on 2 April 2016 by Ferdeche
Answered by
Honest John
AdBlue is £15.99 for 10 litres which can last about 5000 miles so it is not a colossal additional expense. But the 2.0TDI is better suited to the car anyway. The 1.4TSI ACT 150 is even better suited, but not for your high mileage. You still need diesel. We don't have any feedback of SCR/AdBlue v/s a plain DPF. Usually means a tank where the spare wheel would fit so nowhere to put a spare wheel.
Our Fuel Cost Calculator shows you which will be the best choice for you.
Compare the running costs of petrol, diesel and electric cars to make the right choice for you.
Similar questions
Car manufacturers are continuing to manufacture diesel cars despite all the adverse publicity about diesel. Nearly all motoring websites continue to recommend diesel as the best buy in versions of automatic,...
I'm currently running a 2009 Volkswagen Golf Plus 2.0 TDI that I've had for almost five trouble-free years. It'll be at 90,000 miles soon and I think I should get out before I have to spend money on it....
I'm looking at buying a Honda Civic i-DTEC 1.6 or a petrol Mazda 3 2.0 SE-L. Could you recommend a diesel engine or suggest whether petrol is the way to go based on future diesel city taxes. Probably looking...
Related models
Boot capacity is massive. Limousine-like levels of passenger space. Refined driving experience favours comfort. Tremendous value for money.
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
